J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign

Latest J7 news....

J7: 7/7 Inquests - News & Analysis
Recent J7 Blog Entries

Bookmark and Share

07/07/15: Tenth anniversary of 7/7: 7/7 Ten Years On - An indictment of the State and the state of investigative journalism

03/10/11: New 7/7 Video released by Tom Secker: 7/7: Crime and Prejudice

03/06/11: J7 announce the launch of the Official blog of the Free Mohammed Campaign.

21/03/11: J7 publish our Submission to the Inquests regarding resumption of the inquests into the four.

29/10/10: J7 publish 7/7 Inquests transcripts as searchable, print-friendly PDFs.

16/10/10: J7 launch the dedicated new J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog for latest Inquests news and analysis.

07/10/10: J7 publish our Submissions to the 7 July Inquests, a series of documents compiled following Lady Justice Hallett's decision to accept submissions suggesting questions and lines of inquiry for the Inquests.

10/08/10: A new film 7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction has been released that places 7/7 in its wider historical and political context, and examines some of the many unanswered questions that still surround 7 July 2005.

01/08/10: J7 publish a review of another 7/7 related book, Out of the Tunnel, by Rachel 'North'.

07/07/10: J7 publish a detailed analysis of the number 30 bus explosion in Tavistock Square.

01/11/09: J7 respond to two 7/7 articles published in Notes from the Borderland issues 7 and 8. Read our response here.

01/11/09: Debunking 7/7 Debunking: An article in two parts that debunks some of the disingenuous attacks against those not convinced by the official story of 7/7. Read Part 1 here and read Part 2 here. October 2010 update: Debunking 7/7 Debunking Part 3.

04/07/09: J7 publish a revised, updated and expanded list of nine possible Alternative Hypotheses.

03/03/09: J7 publish an exclusive interview with political prisoner Hussain al-Samamra, a Palestinian who sought political asylum in the UK, only to be imprisoned for two years without charge by the British State.

13/01/09: J7 challenge assertions made by Paul Stott in his paper and presentation to the Anarchist Studies Network conference at Loughborough University

14/04/08: Latest J7 article in the Capitalising on Terror series published: Human Rights Abuses & The Demonisation of 'The Enemy' in Secret Britain

07/03/08: J7 publish two new articles summarising the results of the 7/7 investigation, "Three years of investigation, 7 arrests, 3 charges" - Part 1 and Part 2. See also the latest update.

07/02/08: J7 Exclusive Report: Peter Power's CV Fakery - 7/7 terror rehearsal man and regular BBC 'terror' consultant was suspended from Dorset Police pending an internal inquiry that resulted in a file being sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions. Full story here.

04/01/08: In July 2007 the BBC approached J7 asking for participants in a 'documentary' about 7/7. Six months after initial contact, the BBC revealed the 'documentary' was part of BBC2's risible Conspiracy Files series. On learning this, J7 declined to participate. Find out why in the full J7 response to the BBC.

03/12/07: 7/7 Ripple Effect - J7 issue a rebuttal and rejection of the film and its unsubstantiated speculation.

05/11/07: Latest J7 Flyer published. View here, download PDF here and here

11/09/07: J7 book review - J7 reviews The 4th Bomb, a book by Daniel Obachike.

11/09/07: J7 reconstruct and republish the 7-7 discussion from the forum of cult writer/director Alex Cox.

24/08/07: Over a year since Dr John Reid acknowledged a fundamental error in the official Home Office 7/7 narrative, J7 receive a response to a series of Freedom of Information requests which includes an amendment to the repeatedly discredited narrative. Read the story and the revised section of the Home Office narrative on the J7 blog.

16/08/07: Channel 4 News' Darshna Soni blogs about the need for a 7/7 public inquiry and asks how independent or public such an inquiry would be under the Inquiries Act 2005, a piece of legislation that puts the government in control of 'independent' inquiries - 7/7 and the public inquiry dilemma, formerly titled, "Why it's time for a public inquiry into 7/7"

13/08/07: "Anyone who thinks the [Home Office] report is a full account is not being serious or realistic." On the launch of his new film The Homefront, the Cousin of 7/7 victim Anthony Fatayi Williams, filmmaker Thomas Ikimi, tells J7 about his film and the experiences of his family at the hands of the government since 7/7.

30/06/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of King's Cross / Russell Square incidents

04/06/07: July 7th Truth Campaign interviewed on Channel 4 News as a new survey shows 59% of Muslims don't believe the government has told the whole truth about 7/7. Watch Darshna Soni's original report, Survey: 'government hasn't told truth about 7/7', read viewer comments on the piece that show it's not just Muslims who don't believe we have been told the truth. See also Darshna Soni's follow-up blog and 7/7 The Conspiracy Theories which explains some of the many errors and anomalies in the official story.

03/06/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of Edgware Road / Paddington incidents

28/05/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of Liverpool Street / Aldgate / Aldgate East incidents

02/05/07: Full transcript and video of Tayab Ali's post-crevice statement on behalf of Salahuddin Amin

01/05/07: Video, audio and full transcript of Imran Khan's statement on behalf of Nabeel Hussain, who was acquitted of all charges in the Crevice trial

01/05/07: Transcript of Imran Khan's statement on behalf of the 5 men convicted in the Operation Crevice trial, given at the end of the trial on 30/04/07, which includes a statement by J7 on the renewed calls for a public inquiry into the events of 7/7

07/03/07: J7 publish a new article by Professor David MacGregor, 'July 7th as Machiavellian State Terror?' an article in which the events of 7/7 are given historical context and examined as potential acts of, 'Machiavellian state terror, spectacular violence perpetrated against the state by elements of the state itself'.

26/02/07: J7 is pleased and honoured to announce the publication of "The economics of 7/7 and other mysteries of capitalism explained", an article written for the July 7th Truth Campaign by writer and journalist William Bowles.

24/02/07: Brand new J7 article Capitalising on Terror - Who is really destroying our freedoms? - A look at how 7/7 has been used as the justification for the imposition of Draconian laws that criminalise everyone.

06/02/07: J7 publishes the London Bombings Dossier - an extensive portfolio of research by David Minahan, former National President of the MSF (Amicus) Union.

11/01/07: Above Top Secret publish an interview with J7 Truth Campaign team.

Full J7 news archive

New Statesman Media Awards 2006 Nominated

j7 logo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

London 7/7: How to Be Good FAQ

Download FAQ as PDF

London 7/7 - How To Be Good FAQ

Frequently asked questions about How to Be Good in connection with July 7th. If you have no idea what this refers to, read this first, and read this too. Please distribute this important information about July 7th freely.

What's all the fuss about?

Since the events of July 7th 2005 the media has consistently reported factually inaccurate information about the movements of the alleged suicide bombers and the movements of the Thameslink trains from Luton.

How can this be?

The story starts with a CCTV image. Since July 7th, only one image has ever been released that purports to show all four alleged suicide bombers together. The image is said to be a frame of CCTV footage which shows the accused outside Luton Station, some 30 miles from the scene of the incidents. The image is timestamped a few seconds before 7:22am and only one of the faces in the picture is even vaguely identifiable. It looks like the photo below. Metropolitan Poliice Photofit

In a press conference in the days after July 7th the Metropolitan Police stated that the alleged suicide bombers caught the 7.40am Thameslink train from Luton to King's Cross. Subsequent media reports have claimed that they caught either the 7.40 train or, oddly enough given the police statement, the 7.48 train. Both of these statements are false. Here's why; On the morning of July 7th the 7.40 Thameslink train from Luton to King's Cross was cancelled and the 7.48 train left at 7.56, only to arrive at King's Cross Thameslink Station at 8.42am, not at 8:20am as per the scheduled timetable and as reported across the media.

King's Cross underground station is several minutes walk away from the Thameslink station. By 8.42am that morning, two of the affected trains had already left King's Cross underground station. Both the information about the actual operating schedule of the Luton to King's Cross Thameslink trains and departure times from King's Cross of the affected Underground trains have been confirmed by independent public researchers, a fact-checking exercise that no mainstream source appears to have bothered with.

So what?

Well, according to Sir Ian Blair, July 7th was the start of the 'largest criminal inquiry in English history' yet, to date, the police and media versions of events rely on stories that have the alleged suicide bombers catching a train from Luton that:

a) Was cancelled and did not run on July 7th, or
b) A train that arrived in London too late to catch the affected Underground trains.

Why is any of this important?

Quite simply, it means that the original police story of what happened on July 7th has the alleged suicide bombers on a train to London that did not run. Are the British Police so incompetent that they wouldn't think to verify whether or not the train ran that they were alleging the alleged suicide bombers caught? Or, alternatively, if the police story places the alleged bombers on a train that did not run then perhaps we should assume that all the stories about these four young men are as credible as the one that has them catching a train that didn't run? Alternatively, there's the media story of how the alleged bombers rode from Luton to London on a train that arrived too late for them to catch the affected Underground trains as they left King's Cross.

Wow! They're lying to us about the day the bombs came to London! Is there anything I can do about it?

Yes, they are lying to you about the day the bombs came to London and, yes, there is lots you can do about it. All media stories that refer to the alleged suicide bombers catching either the 7.40 or the 7.48 train from Luton to King's Cross are factually incorrect and you have a right to complain to the editor of the offending publication and the Press Complaints Commission.

Luckily, in the United Kingdom, there are certain obligations on the media to correctly report the facts and, in instances where it can be shown they have incorrectly reported the facts, there is an obligation on the publisher to acknowledge the error, to correct it once it has been recognised and, where appropriate, issue an apology for their error.

OK, so who do I get in touch with?

As well as directly getting in touch with the editors and journalists of offending publications, there are a number of other organisations with whom you can get in touch.

The Press Complaints Commission

Complaints about incorrectly reported facts in the press should go to the Press Complaints Commission. The PCC is funded by the industry and allows members of the public to complain about articles in local, regional and national newspapers and magazines. It is recommended that complainants make an initial approach to the editor of the offending publication but there is no obligation to have done so.

In some cases however, in order to comply with PCC guidelines, it may be beneficial to complain directly to the editor of the offending publication. Complaints must be lodged within two months of the article appearing OR the last letter received from the editor, hence why it may be useful to complain directly to the editor in the first instance.

The PCC also expects you to specify which clauses in the industry's Code of Practice have been breached and how, and to provide evidence to support the complaint. The Press Complaints Commission Code of Practice states:

1. Accuracy

i) The Press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

ii) A significant inaccuracy, mis-leading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and - where appropriate - an apology published.

iii) The Press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.

All reports that refer to the alleged suicide bombers catching either the 7.40am or 7.48am Thameslink trains from Luton to King's Cross on the morning of July 7th are factually incorrect and you have a right – nay, a personal public duty - to report that inaccuracy to the Press Complaints Commission and to demand that the factual errors be acknowledged and corrected with due prominence. Where appropriate, an apology should also be issued for not bothering to check such a simple fact before going to print. Reports which state that the alleged bombers arrived at King's Cross in line with mistakenly reported departure times are also incorrect and can be challenged on the basis of their inaccuracy.

There is an online version of the Press Complaints Commission complaints form here:


You can also write to the Press Complaints Commission at the following address:

Press Complaints Commission
Halton House
20/23 High Holborn
London, EC1N 2JD

Helpline: 0845 600 2757
Telephone: 020 7831 0022
Facsimile: 020 7831 0025
: 020 7831 0123
Email: complaints@pcc.org.uk
Website: www.pcc.org.uk

In instances where a complaint is past the two month deadline imposed by the PCC, write directly to the editor of the offending publication with your complaint. Upon receipt of a response from the editor, you can then lodge a complaint with the PCC within two months of response from the offending editor.

The PCC will be then send your complaint to the editor of the offending publication for comment, you are then given a chance to respond, and the editor is then asked to comment further. If a resolution is not reached, the Commission will then makes its own judgement. If you are unsatisfied, you can demand that the matter be reconsidered with the ultimate decision being the sole domain of the PCC.

Complaining to the BBC

The BBC have been rather good at getting the train times wrong and have done so in BBC2's flagship science and documentary programme, Horizon. On 27th October 2005, the Horizon programme subtitled "The 7/7 Bombers – A Psychological Investigation: What makes someone want to blow themselves – and others – up?", the BBC employed the services of Mark Sageman, an ex-CIA case officer and forensic psychiatrist, 'to look beyond the individual', professing to offer an unsuspecting and unwitting British public an explanation of what might drive four young, British, Muslim men to commit the atrocities of July 7th.

Apparently "new evidence from Marc Sageman show[ed] that extremist cells can form spontaneously, without any connections to established organisations." Sageman refers to this as his 'bunch of guys' theory. Armed with this 'bunch of guys' theory and no-doubt a fat cheque from the BBC, Dr Andrew Silke set about reconstructing the journeys of the alleged suicide bombers on the morning of July 7th. In the programme Silk apparently caught the same 7.48 train from Luton to King's Cross that the accused did on July 7th which, as we already know, they didn't. Silke also told us that the train arrived into King's Cross at 0826, which it didn't. So great is Mark Sageman 'bunch of guys' theory that not only do bombers no longer need any formal connections to established organisations, they can also catch a trains that don't run, or trains that arrive to late to place them at the scene of the crime.

Unfortunately, the BBC is the only avenue of complaint for a factual inaccuracy in their broadcast content. Anyone who seeks a resolution to why one of the BBC's flagship science and documentary programmes are giving out factually incorrect information and reporting it as 'fact' have no recourse to the likes of Ofcom who appear to take no interest in whether the BBC's content is factually accurate or not.

From the BBC complaint guidelines:

Can I complain to an outside body?

Yes. You can complain to Ofcom about all issues except impartiality, inaccuracy and some commercial issues. These remain the responsibility of the BBC Governors under the Communications Act 2003.

For those that missed the programme, you can download the offending sections of Horizon which show the incorrect departure and arrival times of the Thameslink trains from here:


Lodging a complaint with the BBC

The rules for complaints to the BBC can be found here:


The BBC's online complaints form is here:


To check the BBC's responses to complaints, go here:


You can also contact the BBC by phone on 08700 100 222* to make your complaint.
(*calls may be monitored for training. Textphone on 08700 100 212.)

What else can I do?

Write to your member of parliament, journalists, editors, magazines, council members, union representatives of the train drivers and underground staff affected and let them know your concerns about the factual inaccuracies in the stories so far. While you're at it, you could also ask quite when one low-quality image allegedly showing the accused some 30 miles from the scene of ANY crime has ever constituted sufficient evidence to act as judge, jury and executioner for anyone, much less innocent commuters in London.

For additional information and assistance about lodging complaints against the media, the MediaWise organisation exist to provide assistance with ensuring ethical and legal standards of conduct by the media:


Good luck and be sure to let us know how you get on!


J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign


email: julyseventh[at]fastmail.net

Download FAQ as PDF

j7 logo J7:Inquests Blog | J7:Blog | J7:FB Group | J7:FB Page | J7:Forum | Contact J7 | Espanol | italiano | portuguese | Francaise | german |