J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign

Click here to sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE / INQUIRY Petition

Latest J7 news....

J7: 7/7 Inquests - News & Analysis
Recent J7 Blog Entries

Bookmark and Share

07/07/15: Tenth anniversary of 7/7: 7/7 Ten Years On - An indictment of the State and the state of investigative journalism

03/10/11: New 7/7 Video released by Tom Secker: 7/7: Crime and Prejudice

03/06/11: J7 announce the launch of the Official blog of the Free Mohammed Campaign.

21/03/11: J7 publish our Submission to the Inquests regarding resumption of the inquests into the four.

29/10/10: J7 publish 7/7 Inquests transcripts as searchable, print-friendly PDFs.

16/10/10: J7 launch the dedicated new J7: 7/7 Inquests Blog for latest Inquests news and analysis.

07/10/10: J7 publish our Submissions to the 7 July Inquests, a series of documents compiled following Lady Justice Hallett's decision to accept submissions suggesting questions and lines of inquiry for the Inquests.

10/08/10: A new film 7/7: Seeds of Deconstruction has been released that places 7/7 in its wider historical and political context, and examines some of the many unanswered questions that still surround 7 July 2005.

01/08/10: J7 publish a review of another 7/7 related book, Out of the Tunnel, by Rachel 'North'.

07/07/10: J7 publish a detailed analysis of the number 30 bus explosion in Tavistock Square.

01/11/09: J7 respond to two 7/7 articles published in Notes from the Borderland issues 7 and 8. Read our response here.

01/11/09: Debunking 7/7 Debunking: An article in two parts that debunks some of the disingenuous attacks against those not convinced by the official story of 7/7. Read Part 1 here and read Part 2 here. October 2010 update: Debunking 7/7 Debunking Part 3.

04/07/09: J7 publish a revised, updated and expanded list of nine possible Alternative Hypotheses.

03/03/09: J7 publish an exclusive interview with political prisoner Hussain al-Samamra, a Palestinian who sought political asylum in the UK, only to be imprisoned for two years without charge by the British State.

13/01/09: J7 challenge assertions made by Paul Stott in his paper and presentation to the Anarchist Studies Network conference at Loughborough University

14/04/08: Latest J7 article in the Capitalising on Terror series published: Human Rights Abuses & The Demonisation of 'The Enemy' in Secret Britain

07/03/08: J7 publish two new articles summarising the results of the 7/7 investigation, "Three years of investigation, 7 arrests, 3 charges" - Part 1 and Part 2. See also the latest update.

07/02/08: J7 Exclusive Report: Peter Power's CV Fakery - 7/7 terror rehearsal man and regular BBC 'terror' consultant was suspended from Dorset Police pending an internal inquiry that resulted in a file being sent to the Director of Public Prosecutions. Full story here.

04/01/08: In July 2007 the BBC approached J7 asking for participants in a 'documentary' about 7/7. Six months after initial contact, the BBC revealed the 'documentary' was part of BBC2's risible Conspiracy Files series. On learning this, J7 declined to participate. Find out why in the full J7 response to the BBC.

03/12/07: 7/7 Ripple Effect - J7 issue a rebuttal and rejection of the film and its unsubstantiated speculation.

05/11/07: Latest J7 Flyer published. View here, download PDF here and here

11/09/07: J7 book review - J7 reviews The 4th Bomb, a book by Daniel Obachike.

11/09/07: J7 reconstruct and republish the 7-7 discussion from the forum of cult writer/director Alex Cox.

24/08/07: Over a year since Dr John Reid acknowledged a fundamental error in the official Home Office 7/7 narrative, J7 receive a response to a series of Freedom of Information requests which includes an amendment to the repeatedly discredited narrative. Read the story and the revised section of the Home Office narrative on the J7 blog.

16/08/07: Channel 4 News' Darshna Soni blogs about the need for a 7/7 public inquiry and asks how independent or public such an inquiry would be under the Inquiries Act 2005, a piece of legislation that puts the government in control of 'independent' inquiries - 7/7 and the public inquiry dilemma, formerly titled, "Why it's time for a public inquiry into 7/7"

13/08/07: "Anyone who thinks the [Home Office] report is a full account is not being serious or realistic." On the launch of his new film The Homefront, the Cousin of 7/7 victim Anthony Fatayi Williams, filmmaker Thomas Ikimi, tells J7 about his film and the experiences of his family at the hands of the government since 7/7.

30/06/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of King's Cross / Russell Square incidents

04/06/07: July 7th Truth Campaign interviewed on Channel 4 News as a new survey shows 59% of Muslims don't believe the government has told the whole truth about 7/7. Watch Darshna Soni's original report, Survey: 'government hasn't told truth about 7/7', read viewer comments on the piece that show it's not just Muslims who don't believe we have been told the truth. See also Darshna Soni's follow-up blog and 7/7 The Conspiracy Theories which explains some of the many errors and anomalies in the official story.

03/06/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of Edgware Road / Paddington incidents

28/05/07: Major new content added - J7 Analysis of Liverpool Street / Aldgate / Aldgate East incidents

02/05/07: Full transcript and video of Tayab Ali's post-crevice statement on behalf of Salahuddin Amin

01/05/07: Video, audio and full transcript of Imran Khan's statement on behalf of Nabeel Hussain, who was acquitted of all charges in the Crevice trial

01/05/07: Transcript of Imran Khan's statement on behalf of the 5 men convicted in the Operation Crevice trial, given at the end of the trial on 30/04/07, which includes a statement by J7 on the renewed calls for a public inquiry into the events of 7/7

07/03/07: J7 publish a new article by Professor David MacGregor, 'July 7th as Machiavellian State Terror?' an article in which the events of 7/7 are given historical context and examined as potential acts of, 'Machiavellian state terror, spectacular violence perpetrated against the state by elements of the state itself'.

26/02/07: J7 is pleased and honoured to announce the publication of "The economics of 7/7 and other mysteries of capitalism explained", an article written for the July 7th Truth Campaign by writer and journalist William Bowles.

24/02/07: Brand new J7 article Capitalising on Terror - Who is really destroying our freedoms? - A look at how 7/7 has been used as the justification for the imposition of Draconian laws that criminalise everyone.

06/02/07: J7 publishes the London Bombings Dossier - an extensive portfolio of research by David Minahan, former National President of the MSF (Amicus) Union.

11/01/07: Above Top Secret publish an interview with J7 Truth Campaign team.

Full J7 news archive

New Statesman Media Awards 2006 Nominated

j7 logo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Some questions that need to be answered


London Tube Atrocity - Some questions that need to be answered

By Dr. M. Naseem

War against terror is a just, moral and laudable purpose but it will not be served by making unsubstantiated assertions and attacking civil liberties at home. We at the Birmingham Central Mosque have long before it became fashionable to condemn suicide bombing have condemned it out right because we hold such acts to be against the clear teachings of Islam and against the practice of the Prophet (peace be upon him). We are aware that Cheri Blair, Lady [Jenny]Tonge and many others have expressed an understanding of why some people in Palestine are led to such acts of desperation. This, however, has not changed our opinion. We believe that no amount of suffering, no degree of injustice, justifies breaking one's own principles.  We have not considered such people as martyrs of Islam but as those who acted under the Codes of Nationalism and guided by nationalistic precedents.

Many Muslim leaders and Scholars have shared our views but unfortunately the collective religious hierarchy remained reticent for fear of upsetting the sentiments of some volatile elements in the community who felt outraged at the world’s hypocrisy and inaction against the conditions prevailing in Palestine. The major world powers have to acknowledge that they have acted unjustly, have observed double standards, have killed randomly and have told lies. In spite of this, over the period of time we and other Muslim representatives have openly and clearly condemned every act of killing innocent people.  It has been reported in the media but strangely some in high places remained oblivions of such reports. They deemed Muslims to have not spoken against such atrocities and kept on demanding more from Muslims. We feel so helpless in not being able to redress such somnolence and amnesia.

In the wake of the recent atrocity, the deep rooted subconscious prejudice has suddenly manifested itself as never before and Muslim bashing seems to be more earnest than the need for the national unity and harmony. It is a strange sense of patriotism that finds satisfaction in obscuring the truth and weakening the nation. We are losing lives at home and abroad, step by step our traditions are being broken by those whose duty it is to uphold them, our state had virtually become an outpost of a foreign power, we are slowly moving towards becoming a police state, yet our writers and columnists remain sleep walking in an imaginary world and attacking demons that do not exist.

Where is the evidence that four youths whose pictures were caught by the CCTV cameras, who were among many others passing through the Kings Cross tube station and similarly noted by the cameras, were the real perpetrators of the crime? It is also reported that they had bought return tickets. How did we reject the possibility that they were, like others, just innocent victims of this terrible happening? Would a court of law declare a person guilty simply because he was found standing some miles away from the scene of crime on the date that it occurred? What scientific tests have been carried out to prove this? Why is there such secrecy surrounding the process of investigation? Is there some thing to hide? If so, why?

It is quite apparent that those who are responsible for our safety, in spite of the fact that they were aware of the looming danger, were caught napping and failed to protect us from this happening. Are we now witnessing a process of ‘’Cover up’’ to hide this colossal failure and ineptitude? It is said that forensic tests have been carried out but we are not informed of the nature of these tests and how these led to the conclusions that have been reached? The story presented does not make any sense. These young men had bought return tickets. Surely this is not an indication of an intention of going to the next world? If they were carrying bombs in their rucksacks, their bodies must have been blown to pieces. How did the police identify them so early while it has taken time to identify others? It is said that particles of incendiary chemicals were found on their bodies. Which bodies? The bits here and there? When a bomb explodes it throws out its contents and so the chemical elements are more likely to be on other bodies and nearby objects than the scattered pieces of those who carried out the explosion.

It is said that they had made trips to Pakistan. Every day hundreds of people make trips to India, West Indies, Bangladesh and Pakistan. These are countries of their origins and they have relatives and friends who live there. How does it prove a criminal intent? Much is being made of Madrassas as if these are military academies. Madrassa is an Arabic word which means a school. These Madrassas are religious schools like Roman Catholic and Church of England schools that exist in other countries including Pakistan. Theses are run by Charities and offer literacy and moral education at an affordable price suitable for the economic status of the country. What is the evidence that there is something more sinister in this programme of education?

The only evidence that has led to the 4th alleged bomber is the finding of a driving licence and a credit card belonging to that person. Incidentally this is the third time in recent history that such a plea has been offered to pin point a culprit. First time was, after 11th September atrocity when the aeroplane flying towards Washington was blown up. The heat was so intense that even the metal parts melted but strangely a passport was left intact. Second time it was the so called suicide bomber from England who blew himself up in Israel. His passport was again found intact. A gullible or subservient section of the media faithfully accepts such stories and spreads them as gospel truth. This is the third time that the same tried formula is being used. How many of us carry our driving licence with us every day?

Why would a person intent on destroying himself would take care to take a driving licence and a card with him? How does the finding of a driving licence and a credit card prove that he was the bomber and not an innocent passenger who lost his life in this tragedy? Is not our trust in the political leadership now under unbearable strain? We were told a lie as a reason for going to war on Iraq. Would a court of law consider a witness reliable, who has already been proven to be a liar? On what basis should we accept any thing that comes from this leadership?  Why should we not have an independent, open and transparent process of law? It is not fair to have judges appointed by a government that itself is the subject of scrutiny. The experience of Lords Hutton and Butler enquiries is enough. Is our judiciary not capable of selecting judges to look into such matters? Can our judges not be trusted with any ‘’sensitive material’’ which is considered safe with ministers? We must not forget that these ministers, not very long ago, were ordinary cogs in the political wheel.

On Friday the 16th July, 2005 on BBC1 at 10’o clock news there was a report about the Metropolitan Police Chief Commissioner who asked Muslims to come out of their state of denial. For a civil servant in such a high position, responsible for the care of all communities that make this nation, to enter the political arena with such a partisan attitude is very strange indeed. It is obvious that our political establishment has condoned this.

His concern for Muslims is really touching but hold on, what facts are we Muslims supposed to be denying? Is it a state of denial when we say that throughout the Muslim world we have never known an organisation called Al-Qaeeda? We have never known and accepted Usama-bin-Laden as a Muslim scholar or a leader. All this information comes from just one source i.e. C.I.A. This is not an organisation known for its commitment to truth and justice. Its covert activities are recorded and known. It has in the past, acted against international and civilised law. In intelligence circles a report that comes from a single source is not considered to be reliable.

Going back to the Metropolitan Police Chief Commissioner’s remark, it is strange that our otherwise competent media seems to have suffered a sudden attack of collective narcolepsy on this occasion. This news item was not found in any of the national newspapers on Saturday the 17th of July, 2005. There was no reference to it in the Independent, The Times, The Telegraph, and The Mail . Only Daily Express mentioned his visit to a Muslim Institution but omitted that particular part of his discourse. Does it show that there is a Central Command which orders such black outs? It may be mentioned that this is not the only instance of this kind, it has happened before.

Muslims have done their duty, of their own accord, because of their commitment to their ideology. We condemn every act of terrorism unequivocally, every instance of taking innocent lives as war against Islam. It is not the prerogative of individuals to make war. It is not Jihad (armed struggle) but Fasad (chaos) if done by individuals. Perpetrators of such crimes if they are Muslims, must know that by doing so they are putting themselves out of the pale of Islam. We will have no hesitation in condemning those who are guilty but the guilt has to be proved. We would like to see the whole nation united to safeguard national interests and not divided as it has been in the matters of invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq and treatment of Palestine. The government and the political establishment have a duty to take people of this country into confidence.

At this time therefore Muslims have no case to answer. We can not accept assumptions and hypotheses. We can not allow ourselves to succumb to media management. We can not accept questionable enquiries. All we are requesting is an independent, open and transparent process of law. Surely this is not too much to ask. There is a suspicion that the interests of this country are being sacrificed for the benefit of a foreign power. Only government and the political establishment can remove this suspicion through deeds, not words.

Please sign the J7 RELEASE THE EVIDENCE Petition

j7 logo J7:Inquests Blog | J7:Blog | J7:FB Group | J7:FB Page | J7:Forum | Contact J7 | Espanol | italiano | portuguese | Francaise | german |